So here’s
the thing. I was watching a review at the weekend of the 1993 Indycar World
Series. You know the one with Mansell winning it straight after his F1
championship. It was quite well known.
For me it
was the finest season of motorsport, ever, anywhere. I watched a full replay of
the Indy 500 that year on YouTube the other day and I was glued throughout.
With all due respect, I can’t do that these days with Formula One.
Then it
struck me. The leading contenders that year were ‘old’ when you compare that to
the present day. Think back to ’93 – Mansell, Fittipaldi, (Mario) Andretti. All
over 40. Some over 50. Yet they were still at the sharp end, fighting tooth and
nail. I think the battle between Mansell and Fittipaldi at Cleveland’s airport
circuit was one of the finest battles ever in motorsport history. Gripping,
edgy, lively, gutsy… it was all there.
So this got
me wondering about age in motorsport, hence my blog today.
In other
sports, physically you are limited when it comes to age. Your body performs
better at a younger age – fact. But what about motorsport? Surely if that were
true then younger drivers at the time – Paul Tracey for example – would have
performed better in Indycar 1993. Or was it just inexperience?
Is
motorsport - particularly F1 – now almost obsessed with young drivers? Are ‘junior
programmes’ REALLY necessary or is it
just based on commercial interests? It’s an interesting debate.
I’d love to
put a series of drivers from teenage to 50 in the same car and see who would
come out on top. Would younger age beat experience? Intriguing…